Niall Ferguson says Trump is a populist not a fascistHistorians in the News
tags: fascism, Niall Ferguson, populism, Trump
British historian Niall Ferguson began his talk at the Festival of Dangerous Ideas in Sydney on the weekend by explaining his theory that Mr Trump was in fact a populist and not a fascist, like many have warned.
He pointed to previous points in America’s history when leaders also campaigned on racist slogans like “the Chinese must go” and were anti-free trade but added that racism was not fascism.
While fascists want to overturn the constitution and start wars, Mr Ferguson believes the only war Mr Trump wants to start is a trade war.
Mr Ferguson said there were five ingredients necessary for populism were all present ahead of Mr Trump’s rise: an increase in immigration, rising inequality, perception of corruption and a big financial crisis.
The last ingredient was a demagogue who could connect with their audience and Mr Ferguson said this ability to speak and connect with people could not be taught and was a skill that few retail politicians had, adding “Donald Trump has it”.
Mr Ferguson also dismisses the idea that Russian interference in the election helped decide the election in Mr Trump’s favour because it only made up around 1 per cent of social media content about the election. However, he believes social media in general did make a difference.
A senior fellow at Cambridge University’s Hoover Institute, Mr Ferguson was among a tiny minority of commentators who believed Mr Trump could win in 2016. Others, for example the Daily Kos website predicted Ms Clinton’s chances of becoming president was 92 per cent. The Upshot in The New York Times said the number was 85 per cent. Betfair said 83 per cent.
But Mr Ferguson said he started to think that Mr Trump might win when he saw the numbers showing he was dominating Ms Clinton on Facebook, Twitter and Google search.
His exact prediction was: “Trump leads by substantial margins among male voters, white voters, over-64 voters and degree-less voters. In short, his support looks a lot like the support for Brexit. If, as happened in the UK, those groups turn out more than the pollsters expect and other groups turn out less, the polls will be wrong. He can win.” ...
comments powered by Disqus
- The History Briefing on the 30th Anniversary of the Fall of the Berlin Wall
- History Says Bloomberg 2020 Would Be a Sure Loser
- Then and now: How Trump impeachment hearing is different
- Poland asks Netflix to make changes to documentary about Nazi death camp guard
- What is a caliph? The Islamic State tries to boost its legitimacy by hijacking a historic institution
- Historian James McPherson Interviewed by the World Socialist Web Site on History of Slavery and NYT's 1619 Project
- Black Perspectives Publishes Online Forum: "Researching, Teaching, and Embodying the Black Diaspora"
- Distinguished professor, civil war historian James I. “Bud” Robertson Jr. passes away
- Noel Ignatiev, scholar who called for abolishing whiteness, dies at 78
- Historians Elizabeth Catte, Rebecca Solnit, and Peniel Joseph Quoted in Washington Post Article, "The Democrats Are Moving Left. Will America Follow?"