court packing 
-
SOURCE: WNYC
11/2/2020
The History of 'Court Packing'
Historian Julian Zelizer discusses the history and fallout of FDR's 1937 plan to "pack" the court, and similarities and differences that might come into play in 2021.
-
11/1/2020
Reconsidering "Court Packing" as Restoring Governing Norms
by Greg Bailey
The Republicans' choice to push through Amy Coney Barrett's nomination with the backing of a minority of the country means a new Congress must consider corrective action in the name of justice and democracy.
-
SOURCE: New York Times
10/27/2020
Pack the Courts
by Larry Kramer
The former Dean of Stanford Law School argues "once cooperation breaks down, the only play to restore it is tit-for-tat. It’s the only way both sides can learn that neither side wins unless they cooperate."
-
10/25/2020
FDR Was Right to Propose Enlarging the Court
by James D. Robenalt
Franklin Roosevelt's error in 1937 was not to propose expanding the court, it was to fail to explain and defend his popular political reasons for doing so.
-
SOURCE: The New Republic
10/14/2020
The Case Against Packing the Court
by Jeff Shesol
The main risk for Biden isn't that court packing would escalate partisan war over the courts. It's that it might destroy his own Democratic coalition.
-
SOURCE: CNN
10/12/2020
Why History Shows 'Court Packing' Isn't Extreme
by Nicole Hemmer
The politicized change in the size of the court has already happened. It occurred in 2016, when a Republican-controlled Senate allowed the court to shrink to eight justices.
-
SOURCE: The Conversation
10/12/2020
Packing the Court: Amid National Crises, Lincoln and His Republicans Remade the Supreme Court to Fit their Agenda
by Calvin Schermerhorn
In remaking the court in Republicans’ image, the party got what it wanted – but not what was needed to fulfill the promise of “a new birth of freedom.”
-
SOURCE: Washington Post
9/24/2020
FDR Tried to Pack the Supreme Court During the Depression. It Was a Disaster for Him.
Franklin Roosevelt's efforts to expand the Supreme Court to overcome conservative hostility to the New Deal didn't go well for him, though patience paid off as his judicial antagonists retired or died during his presidency.
-
SOURCE: National Geographic
9/20/2020
Why The Supreme Court Ended Up With Nine Justices—And How That Could Change
The number of Supreme Court justices is a matter of legislation and custom, not a constitutional mandate. That number has changed across American history.
-
SOURCE: Washington Post
3/12/19
FDR’s court-packing scheme was a ‘humiliating’ defeat
Yet the idea has been revived by some of the liberals seeking the presidency.
-
SOURCE: The Washington Post
11-19-18
The Supreme Court justices control whether court-packing ever happens
by Thomas M. Keck
They must give the elected branches room to address societal needs.
News
- The Deficit Hawks That Make Moderate Democrats Cower
- The Muddled History of Anti-Asian Violence
- Massive Investment in Social Studies and Civics Education Proposed to Address Eroding Trust in Democratic Institutions
- Lightning Strikes Twice: Another Lost Jacob Lawrence Surfaces
- Former Procter and Gamble CEO: America and the World Need History Majors
- Part of Being a Domestic Goddess in 17th-Century Europe Was Making Medicines
- How Dr. Seuss Responded to Critics Who Called Out His Racism
- Discovery Of Schoolhouse For Black Children Now Offers A History Lesson
- People Longing for Movie Theaters During the 1918 Flu Pandemic Feels Very Familiar in 2021
- How Did "Bipartisanship" Become a Goal In Itself? (Podcast)